There is no need to be alarmed
May 9, 2019

Blain's Morning Porridge 

"My old man said be a Tottenham fan…… [expletives deleted]"

I've never ever being knowingly nice about Spurs before, but I can't fault Norf London's second-best team on last night's result…

There is nothing to worry about in trade negotiations. Apparently, all the flubber and fluster in global markets is due to a simple misunderstanding. The Chinese thought Trump asking the Fed (US Federal Reserve) to ease rates was a sign of US economic slowdown which encouraged them to row back on some of their earlier commitments. And, with Chinese numbers not quite as bad as the spooks thought they were, the US side had also overplayed its hand..…

Silly. They will all be laughing about it tonight when the Chinese arrive in Washington to smooth it all out. Imagine not understanding each other. The talks continue. Or do they? 

Lines have been drawn. The Chinese aren't happy. The Americans are…well what are the Americans..? There seem to have been "communication issues" in the mixed messages Trump's fractured administration has delivered. I read each word of Donald Trump's tweets translated into US$13 billion less on the stock market – and he was still blaming the Chinese at a rally last night while tweeting he's willing to keep tariffs in place for longer than sign a bad deal. "China Broke The Deal" That's hardly diplomatic, and didn't he tell us a trade deal was the easiest thing in the world?

Although the Chinese arrive in Washington tonight, 10-25 percent tariffs will still be slapped on Chinese imports Friday morning with another $325 million to follow. Do the Chinese care? Probably not that much aside from its being a matter of face – Xi can't be chums with a guy who has insulted China. Global supply chains being what they are, the hikes will be passed straight to US consumers to pay - but with inflation so low, what's to worry about?

Actually, the US might have quite a bit to worry about. If US consumers pay for the China tariffs – and they will - then weakening consumer sentiment is just one thing. The last thing the soaraway US market needs is a sharp intake of air from retail, and a consumer spending clampdown reminding them just how weak commercial property and retail malls are.

And how do the Chinese respond to the new tariffs? By putting duties on US goods..? I suspect Chinese consumers will prove more patriotic than their US counterparts – and who needs a reason to buy fewer US imports from cars to planes? Hogs are another matter – we suspect the Chinese authorities are withholding just how badly African swine flu has compromised China's main source of protein.

I read Moody's saying China retaliation could trigger unemployment and a 1.8 percent decline in US GDP (gross domestic product). As with all things relating to any rating agency, discount these numbers dramatically.

Yet the markets, deep down, still expect the US and China are going to reach a trade accommodation in the near future, and none of the bad things will happen.

What if we don't get a deal, and the bad things start to happen..? Under a simple No-deal scenario: the positive market start to 2019 will reverse as it was fuelled by trade optimism; US inflation increases, the Fed undoes its neutral stance and stands ready to address inflation and the market perceives this as profoundly negative; stock market stalls, and bond yields rise catching duration-extended investors out; agri-voters get angry and lash out at Trump.

Maybe it gets more complex. More than a few blogs have wondered about the US right. They suggest part of the US power complex would rather push China than find a trade solution. Years of IP (intellectual property) and US military secrets theft have infuriated the Pentagon. They know China's massive Red Army is a paper tiger today – unable to stage more than demonstrations against US forces. Imagine if they were thinking it's a good time to face up to China now, force them to stand down, and pin them back geopolitically across the globe. 

That would need to happen before China can reform and create a military capable of the significant force projection needed to back its attempt to capture global infrastructure through the "Belt and Road" initiative?

Just thinking out loud, but if Trump is looking for a way to play the tough guy as the "easy" China trade negotiations stumble, maybe he's listening to others? I wonder what the Generals and Admirals think? And what about the China hawks? If they are telling him the US economy is in fine shape and positioned to withstand a trade escalation…. 

Who knows what goes on in Washington? Pretty sure Trump doesn't…..

And on these happy thoughts.. back to the day job….

Bill Blain

Shard Capital





This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across globalcustody.net.

How do I enable cookies in my browser?

Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.

Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.

Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"

Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"

Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK

Blain's Morning Porridge 

"My old man said be a Tottenham fan…… [expletives deleted]"

I've never ever being knowingly nice about Spurs before, but I can't fault Norf London's second-best team on last night's result…

There is nothing to worry about in trade negotiations. Apparently, all the flubber and fluster in global markets is due to a simple misunderstanding. The Chinese thought Trump asking the Fed (US Federal Reserve) to ease rates was a sign of US economic slowdown which encouraged them to row back on some of their earlier commitments. And, with Chinese numbers not quite as bad as the spooks thought they were, the US side had also overplayed its hand..…

Silly. They will all be laughing about it tonight when the Chinese arrive in Washington to smooth it all out. Imagine not understanding each other. The talks continue. Or do they? 

Lines have been drawn. The Chinese aren't happy. The Americans are…well what are the Americans..? There seem to have been "communication issues" in the mixed messages Trump's fractured administration has delivered. I read each word of Donald Trump's tweets translated into US$13 billion less on the stock market – and he was still blaming the Chinese at a rally last night while tweeting he's willing to keep tariffs in place for longer than sign a bad deal. "China Broke The Deal" That's hardly diplomatic, and didn't he tell us a trade deal was the easiest thing in the world?

Although the Chinese arrive in Washington tonight, 10-25 percent tariffs will still be slapped on Chinese imports Friday morning with another $325 million to follow. Do the Chinese care? Probably not that much aside from its being a matter of face – Xi can't be chums with a guy who has insulted China. Global supply chains being what they are, the hikes will be passed straight to US consumers to pay - but with inflation so low, what's to worry about?

Actually, the US might have quite a bit to worry about. If US consumers pay for the China tariffs – and they will - then weakening consumer sentiment is just one thing. The last thing the soaraway US market needs is a sharp intake of air from retail, and a consumer spending clampdown reminding them just how weak commercial property and retail malls are.

And how do the Chinese respond to the new tariffs? By putting duties on US goods..? I suspect Chinese consumers will prove more patriotic than their US counterparts – and who needs a reason to buy fewer US imports from cars to planes? Hogs are another matter – we suspect the Chinese authorities are withholding just how badly African swine flu has compromised China's main source of protein.

I read Moody's saying China retaliation could trigger unemployment and a 1.8 percent decline in US GDP (gross domestic product). As with all things relating to any rating agency, discount these numbers dramatically.

Yet the markets, deep down, still expect the US and China are going to reach a trade accommodation in the near future, and none of the bad things will happen.

What if we don't get a deal, and the bad things start to happen..? Under a simple No-deal scenario: the positive market start to 2019 will reverse as it was fuelled by trade optimism; US inflation increases, the Fed undoes its neutral stance and stands ready to address inflation and the market perceives this as profoundly negative; stock market stalls, and bond yields rise catching duration-extended investors out; agri-voters get angry and lash out at Trump.

Maybe it gets more complex. More than a few blogs have wondered about the US right. They suggest part of the US power complex would rather push China than find a trade solution. Years of IP (intellectual property) and US military secrets theft have infuriated the Pentagon. They know China's massive Red Army is a paper tiger today – unable to stage more than demonstrations against US forces. Imagine if they were thinking it's a good time to face up to China now, force them to stand down, and pin them back geopolitically across the globe. 

That would need to happen before China can reform and create a military capable of the significant force projection needed to back its attempt to capture global infrastructure through the "Belt and Road" initiative?

Just thinking out loud, but if Trump is looking for a way to play the tough guy as the "easy" China trade negotiations stumble, maybe he's listening to others? I wonder what the Generals and Admirals think? And what about the China hawks? If they are telling him the US economy is in fine shape and positioned to withstand a trade escalation…. 

Who knows what goes on in Washington? Pretty sure Trump doesn't…..

And on these happy thoughts.. back to the day job….

Bill Blain

Shard Capital



Free subscription - selected news and optional newsletter
Premium subscription
  • All latest news
  • Latest special reports
  • Your choice of newsletter timing and topics
Full-access magazine subscription
  • 7-year archive of news
  • All past special reports
  • Newsletter with your choice of timing and topics
  • Access to more content across the site

More on:  Market commentary