People will demand sanctions
April 10, 2019

Blain's Morning Porridge 

"People will demand sanctions, as long as the pump price doesn't go up…  "

After the International Monetary Fund cuts its global growth outlook to slowest since crisis, it's going to be an interesting day with the US Federal Reserve not really telling us what it might really think, and the European Central Bank trying to fool us that "these are not the droids we're looking for" as they get set to pump prime the ailing Eurosphere through further monetary experimentation. (With the Americans about to impose tariffs on Yoorp's  helicopter exports, perhaps the ECB should consider buying any surplus birds? Since zero rates have had zero effect, maybe direct money dropped from above will…)

Elsewhere, the EU clocks up a tactical win against the UK by granting a further Brexit extension. Political analysts are trying to figure what this does to UK politics: will current prime minister Theresa May be replaced as leader of the Selfservatives, and/or will political gridlock precipitate an election, resulting in a Labour minority supported by a greedy Scottish National Party? New Year's day sounds like a very stupid day for a UK exit into thin markets. It looks like we're in for further sterling-Brexit uncertainty. Joy.. oh joy…

I'm out in Australia till Easter so to amuse you all let me leave you with a rant about yesterday's big bond story.

ARAMCO

There will be thousands of disappointed fixed income investors this morning…gutted about their low allocations on the Aramco Saudi Oil deal. The US$12 billion deal attracted a book of over $100 billion – meaning most hopeful investors will be scaled back to effectively zero. As it is the world's largest and most profitable company, I am sure most fund managers will justify their attempted purchases of the bonds with mumble-swerve about the need for "portfolio-exposure-balance" and "index-tracking/matching". 

The Saudis will be delighted with the reception for the bonds and the apparent rehabilitation of the country after last year's "unpleasantness". The investment banks leading the deal will be pleased and happy with their fees. For the life of me I can't understand what's to like about this deal. The risk reward – the ten-year benchmark priced at 105 over US treasuries – might look good to yield tourists, but from my perspective it doesn't properly factor in Saudi risk. There is massive execution risk in Saudi paper…though I don't mean literally.

What did investors think they were buying? Aramco made $111 billion profit in 2018, and would be the largest company in the world if floated. Moody's gives Saudi Aramco its A1 rating, stable outlook and admits it has all the characteristics of a Aaa-rated company. It has scale, downstream integration, strong financial flexibility, the lowest cost structure of any oil producer and minimal leverage. It has exclusive access to the largest oil and gas reserves. It does oil very well. There are a few negatives like geographic concentration in Saudi and oil volatility.

But the key issues investors seem to have missed in terms of implications are contained within Moody's comment: "Aramco is (100 percent) wholly owned by the state and is expected to remain under government ownership even after any potential IPO in the future…."

Let's consider what that really means for the credit. Last year we had hints of what's to come when Aramco bought SABIC (Saudi Basic Industries) the state wealth fund – putting $70 billion into state coffers. The delay/cancellation of the planned Aramco IPO means the Saudi ruler, Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, is left with limited funding options for the critical transformation of Saudi Arabia from a tribal oil state into a modern technologically diverse society. Folk have asked why Aramco, the world's richest company, is raising $12 billion. Because…MBS is going to lever it up to pay for Saudi's future. Effectively Aramco is going to be MBS's piggy bank.

Now that could have been a good thing. When he came to power MBS was hailed as a reformer – letting women drive and opening cinemas, blahbity blah blah. That didn't last long. In a very short time MBS went from saviour to despot. First, he took the country into an ill-advised war which his military was unprepared for with rebels in Yemen.

Then he shook down the country's richest businessmen to fund his "vision", (and the same day bought a luxury yacht). Six months ago Saudi was untouchable, pilloried by global opinion for the state-sanctioned brutal murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi. World leaders refused to be seen with the Kingdom's ruler and snubbed his Desert Davos. 

MBS is not the product of western universities with an educated liberal streak – he's been raised and educated to be an absolute monarch with traditional Saudi values – which pretty much equates with "wahabbi, mercurial autocrat and an approach to problems that out-Trumps Trump".

However, Saudi's problems didn't start with MBS. They have been brewing for years as the bloated multi-thousand princes making up the royal family consumed most of the oil revenue, leaving the bulk of the population underemployed and living on the fringes. The Saud royal family deal with the tribes was always: we'll take the money and keep you comfortable. That is breaking down. MBS needs Aramco to fund the modernization of his kingdom, run economic and social reform, innovate new technologies and diversify the economy beyond oil.

That's a massive investment execution risk, and he only has a few short years to put it all in place: the major cities are surrounded by sink estates of unemployed Saudi youth hooked on state handouts and highly susceptible to radicalism.

Officially unemployment is 13 percent, but underemployment across Saudi society is much higher after years of oil subsidy. Youth unemployment was recently cited by Brookings as high as 42 percent! Educational standards and achievements are very low outside the top strata of society.

Meanwhile, Saudi wobbles politically trying to retain US support, its regional allies, while Iran hovers on the doorstep. Add a level of political risk to the equation.

The execution risk of Saudi Arabia being able to transform itself – which is the real risk investors who piled into the 30-year Aramco bond are taking – is huge.

And it gets even bigger when you add in the ESG perspective – environmental, social and governance. Saudi Arabia's human rights record is abysmal. It's starving political prisoners in its jails, is willing to shake down business leaders and ignore the rule of law, is blockading counties like Qatar that disagree with it, and dropping some of the most sophisticated and expensive weapons available on unarmed civilians in neighbouring Yemen. I  could go on to talk about Jared Kushner and the culture of patronage clientism, but I'm sure most people already get it. 

For whatever bizarre reasons investors pledged over $100 billion of orders into the $12 billion of bonds Aramco sold yesterday. Much of the demand was for the long-end 30-year bonds. Bearing in mind likely social, educational, and political issues facing Saudi as its attempts to transition its economy into something diverse, vibrant and sustainable, it's a long-term investment picture that looks…well, frankly, risky. Some would say about as much sense as buying Argentina 100-year bonds. 

I'm really struggling to find anything positive to say about it.

The unprecedentedly strong demand for MBS's private slush fund exposes the myth that everyone wants to be seen to be supporters of ESG investment, and that green and socially aware investment is where your financial advisors are investing your savings. Horsefeathers. The brutal reality is more money was voted into proxy Saudi oil risk over two days of marketing than will go into environmental charities over the next 100 years.

That's kind of sad.  

Back after Easter…

Bill Blain

Shard Capital

 

 





This site, like many others, uses small files called cookies to customize your experience. Cookies appear to be blocked on this browser. Please consider allowing cookies so that you can enjoy more content across globalcustody.net.

How do I enable cookies in my browser?

Internet Explorer
1. Click the Tools button (or press ALT and T on the keyboard), and then click Internet Options.
2. Click the Privacy tab
3. Move the slider away from 'Block all cookies' to a setting you're comfortable with.

Firefox
1. At the top of the Firefox window, click on the Tools menu and select Options...
2. Select the Privacy panel.
3. Set Firefox will: to Use custom settings for history.
4. Make sure Accept cookies from sites is selected.

Safari Browser
1. Click Safari icon in Menu Bar
2. Click Preferences (gear icon)
3. Click Security icon
4. Accept cookies: select Radio button "only from sites I visit"

Chrome
1. Click the menu icon to the right of the address bar (looks like 3 lines)
2. Click Settings
3. Click the "Show advanced settings" tab at the bottom
4. Click the "Content settings..." button in the Privacy section
5. At the top under Cookies make sure it is set to "Allow local data to be set (recommended)"

Opera
1. Click the red O button in the upper left hand corner
2. Select Settings -> Preferences
3. Select the Advanced Tab
4. Select Cookies in the list on the left side
5. Set it to "Accept cookies" or "Accept cookies only from the sites I visit"
6. Click OK

Blain's Morning Porridge 

"People will demand sanctions, as long as the pump price doesn't go up…  "

After the International Monetary Fund cuts its global growth outlook to slowest since crisis, it's going to be an interesting day with the US Federal Reserve not really telling us what it might really think, and the European Central Bank trying to fool us that "these are not the droids we're looking for" as they get set to pump prime the ailing Eurosphere through further monetary experimentation. (With the Americans about to impose tariffs on Yoorp's  helicopter exports, perhaps the ECB should consider buying any surplus birds? Since zero rates have had zero effect, maybe direct money dropped from above will…)

Elsewhere, the EU clocks up a tactical win against the UK by granting a further Brexit extension. Political analysts are trying to figure what this does to UK politics: will current prime minister Theresa May be replaced as leader of the Selfservatives, and/or will political gridlock precipitate an election, resulting in a Labour minority supported by a greedy Scottish National Party? New Year's day sounds like a very stupid day for a UK exit into thin markets. It looks like we're in for further sterling-Brexit uncertainty. Joy.. oh joy…

I'm out in Australia till Easter so to amuse you all let me leave you with a rant about yesterday's big bond story.

ARAMCO

There will be thousands of disappointed fixed income investors this morning…gutted about their low allocations on the Aramco Saudi Oil deal. The US$12 billion deal attracted a book of over $100 billion – meaning most hopeful investors will be scaled back to effectively zero. As it is the world's largest and most profitable company, I am sure most fund managers will justify their attempted purchases of the bonds with mumble-swerve about the need for "portfolio-exposure-balance" and "index-tracking/matching". 

The Saudis will be delighted with the reception for the bonds and the apparent rehabilitation of the country after last year's "unpleasantness". The investment banks leading the deal will be pleased and happy with their fees. For the life of me I can't understand what's to like about this deal. The risk reward – the ten-year benchmark priced at 105 over US treasuries – might look good to yield tourists, but from my perspective it doesn't properly factor in Saudi risk. There is massive execution risk in Saudi paper…though I don't mean literally.

What did investors think they were buying? Aramco made $111 billion profit in 2018, and would be the largest company in the world if floated. Moody's gives Saudi Aramco its A1 rating, stable outlook and admits it has all the characteristics of a Aaa-rated company. It has scale, downstream integration, strong financial flexibility, the lowest cost structure of any oil producer and minimal leverage. It has exclusive access to the largest oil and gas reserves. It does oil very well. There are a few negatives like geographic concentration in Saudi and oil volatility.

But the key issues investors seem to have missed in terms of implications are contained within Moody's comment: "Aramco is (100 percent) wholly owned by the state and is expected to remain under government ownership even after any potential IPO in the future…."

Let's consider what that really means for the credit. Last year we had hints of what's to come when Aramco bought SABIC (Saudi Basic Industries) the state wealth fund – putting $70 billion into state coffers. The delay/cancellation of the planned Aramco IPO means the Saudi ruler, Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, is left with limited funding options for the critical transformation of Saudi Arabia from a tribal oil state into a modern technologically diverse society. Folk have asked why Aramco, the world's richest company, is raising $12 billion. Because…MBS is going to lever it up to pay for Saudi's future. Effectively Aramco is going to be MBS's piggy bank.

Now that could have been a good thing. When he came to power MBS was hailed as a reformer – letting women drive and opening cinemas, blahbity blah blah. That didn't last long. In a very short time MBS went from saviour to despot. First, he took the country into an ill-advised war which his military was unprepared for with rebels in Yemen.

Then he shook down the country's richest businessmen to fund his "vision", (and the same day bought a luxury yacht). Six months ago Saudi was untouchable, pilloried by global opinion for the state-sanctioned brutal murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi. World leaders refused to be seen with the Kingdom's ruler and snubbed his Desert Davos. 

MBS is not the product of western universities with an educated liberal streak – he's been raised and educated to be an absolute monarch with traditional Saudi values – which pretty much equates with "wahabbi, mercurial autocrat and an approach to problems that out-Trumps Trump".

However, Saudi's problems didn't start with MBS. They have been brewing for years as the bloated multi-thousand princes making up the royal family consumed most of the oil revenue, leaving the bulk of the population underemployed and living on the fringes. The Saud royal family deal with the tribes was always: we'll take the money and keep you comfortable. That is breaking down. MBS needs Aramco to fund the modernization of his kingdom, run economic and social reform, innovate new technologies and diversify the economy beyond oil.

That's a massive investment execution risk, and he only has a few short years to put it all in place: the major cities are surrounded by sink estates of unemployed Saudi youth hooked on state handouts and highly susceptible to radicalism.

Officially unemployment is 13 percent, but underemployment across Saudi society is much higher after years of oil subsidy. Youth unemployment was recently cited by Brookings as high as 42 percent! Educational standards and achievements are very low outside the top strata of society.

Meanwhile, Saudi wobbles politically trying to retain US support, its regional allies, while Iran hovers on the doorstep. Add a level of political risk to the equation.

The execution risk of Saudi Arabia being able to transform itself – which is the real risk investors who piled into the 30-year Aramco bond are taking – is huge.

And it gets even bigger when you add in the ESG perspective – environmental, social and governance. Saudi Arabia's human rights record is abysmal. It's starving political prisoners in its jails, is willing to shake down business leaders and ignore the rule of law, is blockading counties like Qatar that disagree with it, and dropping some of the most sophisticated and expensive weapons available on unarmed civilians in neighbouring Yemen. I  could go on to talk about Jared Kushner and the culture of patronage clientism, but I'm sure most people already get it. 

For whatever bizarre reasons investors pledged over $100 billion of orders into the $12 billion of bonds Aramco sold yesterday. Much of the demand was for the long-end 30-year bonds. Bearing in mind likely social, educational, and political issues facing Saudi as its attempts to transition its economy into something diverse, vibrant and sustainable, it's a long-term investment picture that looks…well, frankly, risky. Some would say about as much sense as buying Argentina 100-year bonds. 

I'm really struggling to find anything positive to say about it.

The unprecedentedly strong demand for MBS's private slush fund exposes the myth that everyone wants to be seen to be supporters of ESG investment, and that green and socially aware investment is where your financial advisors are investing your savings. Horsefeathers. The brutal reality is more money was voted into proxy Saudi oil risk over two days of marketing than will go into environmental charities over the next 100 years.

That's kind of sad.  

Back after Easter…

Bill Blain

Shard Capital

 

 



Free subscription - selected news and optional newsletter
Premium subscription
  • All latest news
  • Latest special reports
  • Your choice of newsletter timing and topics
Full-access magazine subscription
  • 7-year archive of news
  • All past special reports
  • Newsletter with your choice of timing and topics
  • Access to more content across the site